Featherless is the strongest uncensored AI pick right now: $25 a month for unlimited tokens across 781 uncensored and abliterated models, with a published no-logging policy. AnonRouter is the alternative if you want pay-per-token routing from $0.07 per million input tokens on its GLM Heretic route. If you just want the filter-transparency picture before you pick, NoFilter Index publishes which platforms are actually unfiltered versus marketed that way.
TL;DR
- Featherless serves 781 uncensored and abliterated models on one $25/month Chat plan with unlimited tokens and a 32K context.
- Featherless publishes a no-logging policy: chats, prompts and completions sent through its API are not logged or stored.
- AnonRouter lists six text models with an explicit uncensored label, priced per million tokens from $0.07 input / $0.40 output (GLM 4.7 Flash Heretic).
- AnonRouter separates route privacy into Private, E2EE and Anonymous labels, and its content plane runs in an attested Intel TDX confidential VM.
- The uncensored label describes moderation only; it does not promise refusal-free answers or specify who can read your prompt.
- Gemini is not an uncensored tool; it is included as the filtered mainstream baseline, with plans from $0 to $199.99 per month.
- FlirtAlly, the 18+ companion product from the makers of NoFilter Index, is in beta with the waitlist open.
Head-to-head
| Dimension | Featherless | AnonRouter | Gemini | FlirtAlly |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $25/mo Chat plan, unlimited tokens; Developer from $50/mo in creditswinner | Per-token, from $0.07 in / $0.40 out per million on GLM Heretic | $0 to $199.99/mo consumer plans | In beta, waitlist open |
| Uncensored catalog | 781 uncensored/abliterated modelswinner | 6 text models with explicit uncensored label | None; standard moderation | 18+ positioning, claims verified by NoFilter Index |
| Privacy stance | Published no-logging policy for chats, prompts and completions | Route-level Private/E2EE/Anonymous labels; TDX confidential VM content planewinner | No no-log guarantee for consumer chat | Claims tested and the catch named by NoFilter Index |
| Context window | 32K on the Chat plan | 64K to 1M depending on routewinner | Not published per tier in the consumer copy | Not yet published |
| Billing predictability | Flat monthly, cancel anytime | Usage-based, scales with volume | Fixed per-tier monthly | In beta |
| Ease of switching models | Browse catalog, switch model per request via OpenAI-compatible API | Copyable model IDs, switch without another provider account | Model routing chosen by Google, not exposed in the UI | Single product |
| Verification of claims | Published refusal-rate results for its uncensoring work | Uncensored label only from provider catalog metadata; privacy design is open sourcewinner | N/A, makes no uncensored claim | NoFilter Index publishes cells only after verification |
Scores
Featherless
featherless.ai ↗Featherless hosts open-weight uncensored and abliterated models behind an OpenAI-compatible API, so you run them without downloading anything. Its uncensored filter lists 781 models as of July 2026, spanning general reasoning, creative writing, roleplay, security research and small fast chat. The standout picks include Huihui-Qwen3.5-27B-abliterated for general work, gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-uncensored (a 26B MoE with about 4B active parameters and a published 0.7% refusal rate across four test sets), and Huihui-Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-abliterated for fiction and roleplay. The company states plainly that it does not log chats, prompts or completions sent through its API, and that requests are processed in real time and never stored. For uncensored use, that logging stance is usually the deciding factor when picking a provider.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Chat | $25/mo | Unlimited tokens, 32K context, four concurrent units, cancel anytime |
| Developer | $50/mo | Starts at $50/month in credits, billed per token, unused credits roll over |
Pros
- Flat $25/month Chat plan with unlimited tokens removes usage anxiety
- Written no-logging policy covering prompts and completions
- Deep catalog: 781 uncensored/abliterated models across use cases
- Careful abliterations with published results, e.g. 0.7% refusal rate on the Gemma 4 build
- Qwythos-9B fine-tune reports +34 MMLU and +30 GSM8K-strict over its base model
- Cancel anytime on the Chat plan
Cons
- 32K context on the Chat plan is modest for very long manuscripts
- Abliteration can cost a little quality versus the base model, so you should compare
- Four concurrent units may bottleneck heavy parallel workloads
- Small and fast models trade depth for speed
AnonRouter is an OpenAI-compatible router offering 300 models, of which a smaller set carries an explicit uncensored label from provider catalog metadata. As of October 2026 that uncensored collection holds six text models, including google/gemma-4-uncensored (256K context, $0.1625 input / $0.50 output per million tokens), z-ai/glm-4.7-flash-heretic ($0.07 / $0.40, 200K context), an E2EE-labeled Gemma route, two Venice models, and a Qwen 3.6 Plus route with 1M context on an Anonymous privacy label. What sets it apart is route-level privacy labeling: Private means content is not retained after the request, E2EE requires client-side verification and local encryption, and Anonymous hides your AnonRouter identity from the provider but does not guarantee provider retention. Its content plane runs in an attested Intel TDX confidential VM with TLS terminating inside it, and the code that can handle plaintext is public.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| z-ai/glm-4.7-flash-heretic | $0.07/mo | $0.07 per million input tokens, $0.40 per million output tokens, 200K context, Private route |
| google/gemma-4-uncensored | $0.1625/mo | $0.1625 per million input tokens, $0.50 per million output tokens, 256K context, Private route |
| venice/venice-role-play-uncensored | $0.5/mo | $0.50 per million input tokens, $2.00 per million output tokens, 128K context, Private route |
| qwen/qwen-3.6-plus-uncensored | $0.625/mo | $0.625 per million input tokens, $3.75 per million output tokens, 1M context, Anonymous route with no provider-retention guarantee |
Pros
- Lowest listed token rates in the group: $0.07 input on GLM Heretic
- Transparent per-route privacy labels you can check before sending anything
- Open-source privacy design with confidential-VM execution
- Switch models without creating another provider account
- Largest context in the group: 1M on the Qwen route
Cons
- Only six text models carry the explicit uncensored label
- GLM Heretic is experimental; the guide itself says to inspect results before regular use
- Anonymous routes do not guarantee provider retention
- E2EE route requires a client that verifies destination evidence and encrypts locally, and its context allowance is smaller (64K)
- Usage-based billing is harder to predict than a flat rate
Gemini
gemini.google.com ↗Gemini is Google's mainstream assistant, included here as the filtered baseline so you can see what the uncensored tools are measured against. It is not an uncensored product: it ships with Google's standard moderation and no no-log guarantee for chat content. Pricing runs from a Free tier (Gemini 3.6 Flash as primary model, 5 Deep Research reports per month, 15 GB storage) up through Google AI Plus at $4.99/month, Google AI Pro at $19.99/month, and two Ultra plans at $99.99 and $199.99 with 5x and 20x Pro usage limits. Google cut AI Plus from $7.99 to $4.99 in June 2026 and split the old $249.99 Ultra tier at I/O 2026. It is a capable general assistant, but nobody should buy it expecting unrestricted output.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/mo | Gemini 3.6 Flash, 5 Deep Research/month, 15 GB storage |
| Google AI Plus | $4.99/mo | 2x Free usage, video generation, 400 GB storage |
| Google AI Pro | $19.99/mo | 4x Free usage, Deep Search, 1,000 Flow credits, 5 TB |
| Google AI Ultra 5x | $99.99/mo | 5x Pro usage limits, priority access, YouTube Premium, 20 TB |
| Google AI Ultra 20x | $199.99/mo | 20x Pro usage limits, top allotments, 20 TB |
Pros
- Genuinely useful free tier for sampling
- Cheapest paid entry among mainstream assistants at $4.99/month since the June 2026 cut
- Deep Workspace integration for business users
- Large ecosystem and model variety
Cons
- Standard content moderation; not an uncensored tool in any sense
- Free tier model routing is not exposed in the UI, so you cannot rely on 3.1 Pro access
- No published no-logging policy for consumer chat
- Deep Research capped at 5 reports per month on Free
FlirtAlly
FlirtAlly is the 18+ companion product from the makers of NoFilter Index, currently in beta with the waitlist open. It appears on NoFilter Index as a feature card rather than a ranked entry, and no ratings or user quotes are implied while it is in beta. NoFilter Index itself is a blunt, adults-only index of unrestricted AI chat platforms: it tests which ones are actually unfiltered versus merely marketed that way, and names what that costs you in logging, moderation and privacy. Its filter-transparency matrix compares claims against actual behavior, and cells publish only after verification. The disclosure on the footer and about page states that NoFilter Index is operated by the makers of FlirtAlly.
Pros
- Backed by a publisher that verifies every unfiltered claim before publishing
- Adults-only positioning with an explicit 18+ gate
Cons
- In beta, so maturity and stability are unproven
- No ratings or user feedback exist yet while in beta
Pricing compared
What uncensored actually means, and the catches nobody advertises
Which model for which job
Which should you pick?
FAQs
Does uncensored mean the AI will answer everything?
No. The uncensored label describes moderation settings, not a guarantee. AnonRouter's guide states plainly that the label does not promise every request receives an answer, and Featherless notes that abliterated models can still cost a little quality versus their base. Treat uncensored as a selection filter, then test the specific model on your actual task.
Do these tools log my prompts?
It depends on the provider, and this is the question worth checking before anything else. Featherless publishes a policy stating it does not log chats, prompts or completions sent through its API. On AnonRouter, Private routes do not retain content after the request completes, but Anonymous routes leave provider retention unguaranteed, so read the route label every time.
What is the difference between uncensored and abliterated models?
Uncensored is the outcome; abliteration is one method of getting there. It suppresses refusal behavior inside the model instead of retraining it on refusal-free data the way the older Dolphin models were. Abliteration is faster but can cost a little quality, which is why published refusal-rate results, like the 0.7% figure on the Gemma 4 build, matter when you compare.
Is a flat monthly plan or per-token billing cheaper?
Per-token wins at low volume: AnonRouter's cheapest route runs $0.07 per million input tokens, so a light user might spend a few dollars a month. Heavy daily users hit Featherless's $25/month unlimited plan quickly and then pay nothing extra regardless of volume. Estimate your monthly token volume before choosing.
Can I use Gemini uncensored?
No. Gemini is Google's mainstream product with standard moderation and no uncensored option. It is useful as a filtered baseline: plans run from a free tier with 5 Deep Research reports per month up to $199.99 for the Ultra 20x plan, but nobody should expect unrestricted output from it.
Sources
Best Uncensored AI Models in 2026: Run These Top Open LLMs Today - Featherless
Best uncensored AI models in 2026: a guide | ToolScout
Gemini Pricing & Subscription Cost for Pro, Plus and Ultra Plans
AI Pricing: What's the True AI Cost for Businesses in 2026? | Zylo
The 7 best cheap AI tools in 2026 | eesel AI
Best Uncensored AI Models 2026: Tested & Ranked | MangoMind
9 best technology review platforms for 2026 - Guideflow Blog