Featherless is the strongest pick for actually uncensored AI in 2026: $25/month flat gets you unlimited tokens on an OpenAI-compatible API with a published no-logging policy and a catalog of 781 uncensored and abliterated models. AnonRouter is the alternative if you'd rather pay per token (from $0.07 per million input on GLM 4.7 Flash Heretic) and want per-route privacy labels. If you want a vetted shortlist of which adult chat platforms are genuinely unfiltered versus just marketed that way, NoFilter Index's filter-transparency matrix publishes each claim only after verification.
TL;DR
- Featherless charges $25/month flat for unlimited tokens, 32K context, and four concurrent units, with a published policy that it does not log chats, prompts, or completions.
- AnonRouter bills per token: GLM 4.7 Flash Heretic runs $0.07 input / $0.40 output per million tokens, the cheapest listed uncensored text route.
- An uncensored label describes moderation only. AnonRouter's Anonymous routes hide your identity from the provider but provider retention is not guaranteed.
- Featherless's catalog lists 781 uncensored and abliterated models, including Huihui-Qwen3.5-27B-abliterated for general use and Huihui-Mistral-Small-3.2-24B for fiction.
- Abliteration suppresses refusal behavior inside the model instead of retraining on refusal-free data; it can cost a little quality, so compare against the base model.
- Gemini is not an uncensored tool: its free tier and $4.99 Plus plan are cheap, but moderation is standard Google and model routing isn't exposed in the UI.
- FlirtAlly is 18+ and in beta with an open waitlist; its uncensored-cluster claims follow the NoFilter Index verification process, and no ratings are implied while in beta.
Head-to-head
| Dimension | Featherless | AnonRouter | Venice (via AnonRouter) | Gemini | FlirtAlly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25/mo Chat plan | $0.07 per 1M input tokens (GLM Heretic)winner | $0.20 per 1M input tokens | $0 (Free tier); $4.99 Plus | In beta, waitlist open |
| Billing model | Flat monthly subscription, unlimited tokenswinner | Usage-based per token | Usage-based per token | Per-seat subscription tiers | TBD (beta) |
| Uncensored verification | 781 uncensored/abliterated models with per-model pages and refusal-rate datawinner | Label applied only when provider metadata explicitly marks it | Two explicitly labeled uncensored routes | Not uncensored; standard moderation | Claims tested via NoFilter Index matrix before publishing |
| Prompt logging | Published no-logging policy; requests never storedwinner | Per-route: Private (no retention), E2EE, Anonymous (provider retention not guaranteed) | Private route: no retention after request completes | No no-log guarantee published | Not yet published (beta) |
| Max context | 32K on Chat plan | 1M (Qwen route), 256K (Gemma Private)winner | 128K | Not published per-query for consumer tiers | TBD (beta) |
| Ease of setup | OpenAI-compatible API, account and go | OpenAI-compatible, copyable model IDs; E2EE needs client verification | Same router, model-ID switch | Consumer app, zero setupwinner | Waitlist signup |
| Best use case | Heavy roleplay and writing on a flat bill | Developer work needing long context and per-token control | Character roleplay specialist | Filtered mainstream productivity | 18+ chat, verified claims, beta access |
Scores
Featherless
featherless.ai ↗Featherless hosts uncensored and abliterated open-weight models behind an OpenAI-compatible API, so there's nothing to download and you can swap models without a new provider account. Its catalog listed 781 uncensored and abliterated models as of July 2026, with per-model pages carrying specs, release dates, and recommended sampler settings. The standout picks include Huihui-Qwen3.5-27B-abliterated for general reasoning (Apache-2.0, shipped February 2026), gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-uncensored for speed (a 26B mixture-of-experts with about 4B active parameters and a published 0.7% refusal rate across four test sets), Huihui-Mistral-Small-3.2-24B for fiction and roleplay, and Qwythos-9B-Claude-Mythos-5-1M for security research, which Empero's matched-condition evals report at +34 on MMLU over the base. The privacy position is written down: Featherless does not log chats, prompts, or completions sent through its API, and requests are processed in real time and never stored.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Chat | $25/mo | Unlimited tokens, 32K context, four concurrent units, cancel anytime |
| Developer | $50/mo | Starts at $50/month in credits, billed per token, unused credits roll over |
Pros
- Flat $25/month Chat plan with unlimited tokens, so heavy roleplay and writing sessions don't scale your bill
- Written no-logging policy: prompts and completions are not logged or stored
- Deep catalog with per-model specs, release dates, and recommended temperature settings
- Abliteration quality is documented, e.g. gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-uncensored's 0.7% refusal rate with quality effectively unchanged
- OpenAI-compatible API means existing code works with a base-URL change
Cons
- 32K context on the Chat plan is small next to AnonRouter's 256K and 1M routes
- Abliteration can cost a little quality versus the base model, so you need to compare
- Four concurrent units cap parallel requests on the Chat plan
- You're picking models yourself; there's no curated single 'uncensored assistant' experience
AnonRouter is an OpenAI-compatible router offering 300 models, including a collection of six explicitly labeled uncensored text models alongside image-generation entries. The uncensored label is only applied when provider catalog metadata explicitly marks the model as uncensored, never inferred from a name or benchmark. Each route carries its own privacy label: Private means prompt and response content is not retained after the request completes, E2EE requires client-side verification and local encryption, and Anonymous hides your AnonRouter identity from the provider but doesn't guarantee provider retention. The content plane runs in an attested Intel TDX confidential VM with TLS terminating inside it, and the code that handles plaintext is public. Listed routes include google/gemma-4-uncensored at $0.1625/$0.50 per million tokens with 256K context, z-ai/glm-4.7-flash-heretic at $0.07/$0.40 with 200K, and qwen/qwen-3.6-plus-uncensored at $0.625/$3.75 with 1M context on an Anonymous route.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| z-ai/glm-4.7-flash-heretic | $0.07/per 1M input tokens ($0.40 output) | 200K context, Private route, experimental variant |
| google/gemma-4-uncensored | $0.1625/per 1M input tokens ($0.50 output) | 256K context, Private route |
| google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-uncensored | $0.19/per 1M input tokens ($0.88 output) | 64K context, E2EE route |
| venice/venice-uncensored-1.2 | $0.2/per 1M input tokens ($0.90 output) | 128K context, Private route |
| venice/venice-role-play-uncensored | $0.5/per 1M input tokens ($2.00 output) | 128K context, Private route, specialized roleplay |
| qwen/qwen-3.6-plus-uncensored | $0.625/per 1M input tokens ($3.75 output) | 1M context, Anonymous route, provider retention not guaranteed |
Pros
- Lowest token rates in the group: GLM 4.7 Flash Heretic at $0.07 input / $0.40 output per million
- Largest contexts available: 256K on the Private Gemma route, 1M on the Qwen route
- Honest labeling discipline: uncensored only when provider metadata says so
- Open-source privacy design you can audit, with E2EE available for clients that support verification
- Per-token billing suits light or sporadic users who'd waste a flat subscription
Cons
- Anonymous routes don't guarantee provider retention, so the biggest-context model has the weakest privacy label
- E2EE route has only 64K context and requires a client that performs verification and local encryption
- Experimental models (GLM Heretic) need prompt copies and result inspection before regular use
- Usage-based billing is the least predictable structure once volume scales
- You must check moderation and privacy separately for every route you switch to
Venice (via AnonRouter)
toolscout.ai/news/best-uncensored-ai-models ↗Venice appears here through its two explicitly labeled uncensored routes on AnonRouter: venice/venice-uncensored-1.2 for open-ended exploration and unfiltered dialogue, and venice/venice-role-play-uncensored for specialized creative roleplay and character interaction. Both run on Private routes at 128K context, meaning prompt and response content is not retained after the request completes. Pricing splits the pair: the general model costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.90 output, while the roleplay specialist costs $0.50 input and $2.00 output, a premium that has to earn its place on your own writing tasks. The general model is a reasonable middle option if you want Venice's flavor of unfiltered dialogue without the roleplay premium, and switching between the two is a model-ID change rather than a new account.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| venice/venice-uncensored-1.2 | $0.2/per 1M input tokens ($0.90 output) | 128K context, Private route |
| venice/venice-role-play-uncensored | $0.5/per 1M input tokens ($2.00 output) | 128K context, Private route, specialized roleplay |
Pros
- Purpose-built roleplay route, which is what most people searching for uncensored AI actually want
- Private route label with no post-request retention
- 128K context beats Featherless's 32K Chat-plan context
- Direct comparison possible between general and roleplay variants on the same router
Cons
- Roleplay output at $2.00 per million tokens is the second-highest rate in the labeled group
- Only two text routes, so no general-reasoning or code option under the Venice label
- Higher output price needs to earn its place on your own writing tasks before you commit
Gemini
gemini.google.com ↗Gemini is here as the filtered baseline: it's the cheapest capable assistant in this comparison, but it is not an uncensored tool, and that distinction is the whole point of this category. Google's consumer ladder runs Free at $0 (Gemini 3.6 Flash, 5 Deep Research reports per month, 15 GB storage), AI Plus at $4.99 (2x Free usage, video generation, 400 GB), AI Pro at $19.99 (4x Free usage, Deep Search, 5 TB), and two AI Ultra plans at $99.99 for 5x Pro usage and $199.99 for 20x. AI Plus fell from $7.99 to $4.99 on June 8, 2026, and the old $249.99 Ultra tier split in two at Google I/O 2026. The catch for this category: the model serving each consumer query isn't exposed in the UI, access to Gemini 3.1 Pro on the free tier is described only as 'varying,' and standard Google moderation applies throughout. If a tool won't tell you which model answered or how it's filtered, it can't be part of an uncensored workflow.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/mo | Gemini 3.6 Flash, 5 Deep Research/month, 15 GB, varying 3.1 Pro access |
| Google AI Plus | $4.99/mo | 2x Free usage, video generation, 200 Flow credits, 400 GB |
| Google AI Pro | $19.99/mo | 4x Free usage, Deep Search, 1,000 Flow credits, 5 TB |
| Google AI Ultra 5x | $99.99/mo | 5x Pro usage limits, priority access, 20 TB |
| Google AI Ultra 20x | $199.99/mo | 20x Pro usage limits, 20 TB |
Pros
- Cheapest paid entry point of anything here: AI Plus at $4.99/month after the June 2026 price cut
- Genuinely useful free tier with 5 Deep Research reports per month
- Deep Workspace integration for business users
- Transparent usage multipliers: Plus 2x, Pro 4x, Ultra 5x and 20x of Pro limits
Cons
- Not uncensored: standard Google moderation applies at every tier
- Model routing isn't exposed in the UI, so you can't verify which model answered
- Free-tier 3.1 Pro access is described only as 'varying'
- No published no-logging guarantee for prompts
FlirtAlly
FlirtAlly is the 18+ platform from the makers of NoFilter Index, currently in beta with an open waitlist. It appears on NoFilter Index as a feature card, and its uncensored-cluster claims follow the same verification standard the index applies to everyone else: every 'unfiltered' claim gets tested and the catch named in plain terms before it's published. NoFilter Index itself is a blunt, adults-only index of unrestricted AI chat platforms, built around a filter-transparency matrix that records claims versus actual behavior, monthly unfiltered rankings, brand deep-indexes, and policy reads, with reddit quotes only via permalinks. The disclosure is stated plainly in the footer and about page: NoFilter Index is operated by the makers of FlirtAlly. Because the product is in beta, no ratings or user quotes are implied, and the honest read is to treat it as a waitlist candidate rather than a proven option.
Pros
- Claims are held to the same verification standard as every other platform NoFilter Index reviews
- 18+ by design, so the target use case isn't an afterthought
- Operated by a publisher that names the catch on every unfiltered claim in plain terms
- Waitlist is open, so early access is available now
Cons
- In beta, so there's no track record yet
- No ratings or user quotes while in beta, which limits what can be honestly said
- Disclosure that the index and the product share operators means you should read its feature card with that in mind